<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Hardy Heron Users Are Forced to Upgrade?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geekesque.ro/2008/11/18/hardy-heron-users-are-forced-to-upgrade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geekesque.ro/2008/11/18/hardy-heron-users-are-forced-to-upgrade/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=hardy-heron-users-are-forced-to-upgrade</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2011 11:17:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gryc Ueusp</title>
		<link>http://geekesque.ro/2008/11/18/hardy-heron-users-are-forced-to-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Gryc Ueusp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 02:54:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekesque.ro/?p=25#comment-32</guid>
		<description>If you want the latest and greatest software, why are you using an old version of Ubuntu?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want the latest and greatest software, why are you using an old version of Ubuntu?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tiago Faria</title>
		<link>http://geekesque.ro/2008/11/18/hardy-heron-users-are-forced-to-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Tiago Faria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekesque.ro/?p=25#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Me, for example, only use LTS releases. No major reason behind this, but I don&#039;t have patience to be updating every time there is a release.

With the backports repository enabled, I get to use more recent versions of the software, if it&#039;s needed. Most of the time, just the 4 main ones are enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me, for example, only use LTS releases. No major reason behind this, but I don&#8217;t have patience to be updating every time there is a release.</p>
<p>With the backports repository enabled, I get to use more recent versions of the software, if it&#8217;s needed. Most of the time, just the 4 main ones are enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jimcooncat</title>
		<link>http://geekesque.ro/2008/11/18/hardy-heron-users-are-forced-to-upgrade/comment-page-1/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>jimcooncat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 12:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://geekesque.ro/?p=25#comment-30</guid>
		<description>https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports

There&#039;s a couple of ways around this. If your package is available in Backports, you can install the individual .deb from there. If they don&#039;t have what you need, you can request a backport, but if its not a popular package or overly complex it might not be accepted -- or at least take a long time.

Once you&#039;re familiar with the Backports project, you&#039;ll probably want to add the repository to your system. I highly recommend the &quot;pinning&quot; feature described in this document so you select only the backports you need; your best bet is to stick to the original Hardy packages for the ones which you don&#039;t need a more recent version.

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=268687

I was in a situation where packages I wanted (tcl, tk, amsn) weren&#039;t available in backports, so I used the above post to make my own. It took a while for me to figure it out, download the build environment, and test the results. It worked surprisingly slick and was a fun project. Definitely YMMV, and I&#039;d imagine that there are a lot of packages this method won&#039;t work properly for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports" rel="nofollow">https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports</a></p>
<p>There&#8217;s a couple of ways around this. If your package is available in Backports, you can install the individual .deb from there. If they don&#8217;t have what you need, you can request a backport, but if its not a popular package or overly complex it might not be accepted &#8212; or at least take a long time.</p>
<p>Once you&#8217;re familiar with the Backports project, you&#8217;ll probably want to add the repository to your system. I highly recommend the &#8220;pinning&#8221; feature described in this document so you select only the backports you need; your best bet is to stick to the original Hardy packages for the ones which you don&#8217;t need a more recent version.</p>
<p><a href="http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=268687" rel="nofollow">http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=268687</a></p>
<p>I was in a situation where packages I wanted (tcl, tk, amsn) weren&#8217;t available in backports, so I used the above post to make my own. It took a while for me to figure it out, download the build environment, and test the results. It worked surprisingly slick and was a fun project. Definitely YMMV, and I&#8217;d imagine that there are a lot of packages this method won&#8217;t work properly for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

